Wednesday, July 25, 2012

James Holmes: The Darkest Knight!

It's time to Break It Down! 

Two brothers, Christopher and Jonathan Nolan co-wrote the screenplay for the latest summer blockbuster, TheDark Knight Rises.  The Dark Knight is a sobriquet for the Superhero more commonly known as Batman.  The Nolans, in TDKR (The Dark Knight Rises), present the 8th iteration of Batman on celluloid, including two others (Batman Begins2005, and The Dark Knight2008), in their own trilogy.  The complete list of Batman films includes:

  1. Batman1966 (Adam West/Also played the character in the TV Series, which preceded the movie)
  2. Batman1989 (Michael Keaton)
  3. Batman Returns1992 (Michael Keaton)
  4. Batman Forever1995 (Val Kilmer)
  5. Batman and Robin1997 (George Clooney)
  6. Batman Begins2005 (Christian Bale)
  7. The Dark Knight2008 (Christian Bale)
  8. The Dark Knight Rises2012 (Christian Bale)

Batman is known as a mysterious, brooding character; occasionally not clearly recognizable as one of the good guys.  He tends to do his best work at night, which of course is when bats are most active.  These are just a few of the back story reasons that resulted in the Nolans assigning the appellation The Dark Knight to their version of the superhero.

TDKR was eagerly anticipated by fans of the DC Comics character, the TV Show, and the movie series.  However, while the typical storyline would almost certainly have centered upon whether the film broke gross receipts and total attendance records, a Colorado gunman changed all that with a violent and tragic swoop.

For many gun lobbyists have used a quote that remains popular today:

“Guns don’t kill people; people kill people.”

My tacit observation is that is a true statement…that just happens to be incomplete.  To place the discussion into proper context, the complete statement, from an American perspective anyway, should be:

“Guns don’t kill people; people (with guns) kill people.”

Last week, James Eagan Holmes made the Aurora, Colorado midnight screening of TDKR a colossal and catastrophic disaster.  In doing so, at least in Aurora, for that night for some, and forever for others, Holmes became the “Darkest Knight.”

Without rehashing the events of last Friday morning, or giving Mr. Holmes unwarranted star treatment, allow me to provide a brief overview of the results of the unsuspecting assault on a theater filled with innocent people; 70 of whom would soon become casualties, of which 12 lost their lives.  Holmes, dressed in black protective body armour from head to toe, entered the cinema through an exit near the front, unleashed two canisters of a tear gas/pepper spray-like substance, and began to spray those assembled with a barrage of bullets from three weapons; two Glock pistols, and an AR-15 shot gun.  The 12 dead were all fatally shot, and according to Aurora police officials, most of the remaining 58 casualties were shot.

As has been oft reported, James Holmes purchased all three weapons, 6,000 rounds of ammo, and an assortment of materials used to build an array of explosives, and he did so legally.  He used his cache to upon Aurora movie-goers the single biggest act of gun violence in American History.  The resulting Aurora shooting has become, instantly, the latest flashpoint for the great debate on Gun Control.

The only problem is there is no debate.  Oh, the media is certainly banging the drum.  A number of survivors and family members of victims are calling for action.  But for the most part, President Obama, his opponent in the Presidential race, Mitt Romney, and most members of both houses of Congress are AWOL on the subject.  Of course, not surprisingly, the few Republicans who are not seeking cover and moving about below the radar are in fact, gun rights advocates, and proclaim loudly, in essence, “Guns don’t kill people...”

The Second Amendment has long been the defining proviso that the gun lobby hangs its hat upon.  In his continued struggle to negate the influence of the NRA and gun rights advocate. Michael Moore likened the fixation with the concept of the unreduced sanctity of the Second Amendment as being as though it were written by God.  Moore, like many other supporters of more comprehensive Gun Control legislation, argues that the Founding Father’s, whose idea of arms consisted principally of muskets and single shot pistols, could never have fathomed semi-automatic or automatic weaponry.

Moore, in his 2002 Film, Bowling for Columbine, noted the stark contrast in the number of gun homicides in the United States per year and the comparable number in several other wealthy countries.  He examined some of the popular reasons offered as a rationale for why the rate in the United States is so high.  The reasons range from rampant Goth Rock Music, to violent movies, to video gaming, to having a violence-laden history.  In the end, there are countries that equal or exceed us in each category mentioned, but which have substantially fewer murders by gun violence each year.  And the difference is stunning:

  • United States – 11,127 (3.601/100,000)
  • Germany – 381 (0.466/100,000) – More Goth Rock listeners, violent history of its own
  • France – 255 (0.389/100,000) – Same violent movies, violent history of its own
  • Canada – 165 (0.484/100,000)
  • United Kingdom – 68 (0.109/100,000) – Violent history of its own
  • Australia – 65 (0.292/100,000)
  • Japan – 39 (0.30/100,000) – Makes many of the violent video games
If you understand and support the idea of American Exceptionalism, perhaps you can appreciate why even though, as Max Fisher wrote in an article in The Atlantic, the Japanese Constitution includes language that expressly precludes gun ownership (and swords for that matter), it’s perfectly logical for the Second Amendment to incorporate the right to bear arms.  Naturally, it is our inherent Exceptionalism that makes the difference, since we (Americans) wrote the Japanese Constitution.

Mr. Holmes was able to assemble an arsenal in a matter of about 60 days.  Financial resources aside, I don’t believe any individual should have such easy access to weapons and accessories as powerful as those he purchased.  While he did present himself at stores or gun shops to buy the shot gun and the Glocks, he bought most of the ammo and other accessories online.  In general, we should all be concerned by this level and degree of access.  Moreover, given the specific out come of Holmes’ access and subsequent rampage, we should be flat-out alarmed.

And if you are among those who believe the answer is if other in the theater had been armed, someone could have taken him out…I believe that is the wrong answer.  Despite your belief that you are the beneficiary of an abundance of Cool Hand Luke qualities, statistics suggest someone else in the crowded theater would have been killed by you, rather than by Holmes, or in the end, the number of folks killed would have exceeded the 12 who died Friday.  Remember, he dispensed tear gas; he was wearing a gas mask and body armour from head-to-toe.  Chances are, no one else would have been equally prepared for combat.  Ultimately, the more “other guns” in the theater, the higher the likely number of casualties.

I am willing to concede there are no easy solutions to resolving the problem of gun violence in our society.  However, I am convinced if we are to move in the right direction, that movement will spring from crafting and enacting thoughtful and comprehensive gun control policy.

Meanwhile, I am left to reflect that such a policy will have come too late to have prevented “John Holmes: The DarkestKnight!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday. For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:















http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/07/a-land-without-guns-how-japan-has-virtually-eliminated-shooting-deaths/260189/

No comments: